Main menu
You are here
Tue, 06/05/2018 - 02:56 — nibs
This torrent has no flags.
| Size | Seeds | Peers | Completed |
|---|---|---|---|
| 212.91 MiB | 1 | 0 | 44 |
.
Tucker Carlson talks about the #metoo movement catching up with Bill Clinton, death of free speech in the UK, sanctuary city laws impacting elections, sailor pardon by Trump is suing Obama & Comey . Also, George Papadopoulos wife speaks out and he has an exclusive follow-up investigation on the FAA risky behavior. His guest includes: Mark Steyn, Richard Goodstein, Angela Alioto, Douglas Murray, Simona Mangiante Papadopoulos, Michael Pearson, Josh Fox.
Duration: 40m47s, bitrate: 729 kb/s
Video: h264 (Constrained Baseline) (avc1 / 0x31637661), yuv420p, 768x432 [SAR 1:1 DAR 16:9], 599 kb/s, 29.97 fps, 29.97 tbr, 30k tbn, 59.94 tbc (default)
Audio: aac (LC) (mp4a / 0x6134706D), 44100 Hz, stereo, fltp, 127 kb/s (default)
- Log in to post comments
Comments
LOL
he was previously convicted for potentially prejudicing a trial by live streaming via facebook.
He did it again and got arrested for it as he was on a "suspended sentence", meaning that if he broke the conditions as set out by the court then a prison term could be imposed.
We he went and live streamed it, got arrested, PLEADED GUILTY and gave no defense.
so erm..... what's all this that stuff Tucker the fucker is spouting????? because you know... none of it is true...
pax wrote:
What did Carlson spout that isn't true?
THANKS
Great stuff again. About the only place we can find unbiased TRUTH on television at the moment.
Carlson has come a long way from his ...
... ridiculous bow-tie days.
well......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeVji5msvP8
this guy does a quite good job of explaining
Fox news? unbiased? BWAHAHAHAHAHA! fucking hilarious!
Fox News is ridiculously biased...
... but Carlson covers topics which a lot of other news programs ignore.
pax wrote:
Sorry, not going to listen for 52 minutes. I'm fully aware that some people got what happened to Robinson wrong, but that's quite common, and certainly not newsworthy. I've listened to this for 5 minutes now, and all he's talking about is contempt of court. This is a straw man. The point is not that Robinson was convicted, but that the courts ordered the media not to report it.
Could you give me the time where he discusses what Carlson lied about? Or better yet, just tell me yourself.
.....
sigh... contempt of court is no strawman here...... ity's KEY. fucker carlson starts off misdirecting straight off the bat with the multicultural shite.
this is not a "multicultural matter" but a straight up... "repeat offender" case.
Robinson got done for contempt of court for filming live about cases that had not reached a result.
In doing so he pout the "fair trial" principle at risk and that's taken seriously here.
He was given a suspended sentence and told not to do so again.........
So what did he do???? he did exactly the same again in the middle of a series of important court cases which he put at risk of being retried or falling apart.
If Tommy actually cared about the kids and wanted the fuckers on trial to go to jail then he would have left alone but no... Tommy is the most important thing in Tommy's life to he did it again and put at risk the court cases.. plain and simple
As for Katie fucking Hopkins.. he is fucking DESPISED in general here and i am not surprised that rebel media is about the only place that would give her a home, she's very well hated here for her generally hateful,spiteful bullshit and has also been in trouble for telling lies, smearing people and it's cost her court money(along with the daily mail) and jobs and much more. She is NOT a credible person at all, in any way. She's a nasty assed bottom of the barrel gossip columnist who veers from the truth on a regular basis. Hardly a reliable witness.
contempt of court again is NOT a strawman here.. it';s very much the issue and it gets ignored here, also ignored is the fact that HE PLEADED GUILTY and OFFERED NO DEFENSE because you know.. he was guilty.. 100% ,admitted guilt.
this is NOT a free speech issue, it's a legal issue for that contempt.
Now as for the "reporting restriction".. they are called "D-notice" (Delay Notice) and are used for many issues.. btw .. noticed the word "delay".
they are used for things from national security such as when I was a soldier in Ireland where things happened a lot that couldn't immediately get let out into the wild so D notices were issued until such time as the sensitivity of the information was less likely to affect the safety of people/soldiers/operators(intel soldiers) and operational matters to things like this. It's only done when lives, state matters or legal proceedings may be put at risk... they are nothing new
In this instance it was done so that it would not affect the ongoing trial that he could potentially have fucked up and had a knock on effect to the others in that series of trials. These trials have cost a fucking fortune and for that silly fucking prick from Luton to fuck them up while claiming he cares deeply about the kids.... well.. Tommy cares about Tommy and that's all that matters to him.. the rest is window dressing.
These are a bunch of people who have been accused of being serial child molester with years of grooming and obscenity being unraveled in court. witnesses have been giving testimony and that can't be easy for the poor wee fuckers at all and this wanker doing what he did meant that the trial could potentially collapse and at best a retrial would happen or worst of all.. the trial could be fucked up and that isn't good for anyone , would cost a fortune and utterly fail in his stated aims of "saving the kids",.
the reporting restriction must seem very strange to those with court TV live from their legal system.. we do not allow cameras in court and the job of the court artist to draw people in court for the press is still alive and well here.
I know this is hard to understand from countries that have court TV but the integrity of court proceedings here is taken very very seriously and the right to a fair trial even if you are a fuck awful, asshole, reprobate and DESERVE to burn in hell. In this day and age, even if they sequestered the jury how could they stop them seeing stuff online that could affect their "unbiased" judgement on the case?????
pax wrote:
Because you're making the claim. BTW this guy's youtube was posted 2 days before Carlson's show, so he couldn't possibly be referring to him, right?
pax wrote:
Carlson is not interested in the guilt or innocence of Robinson. He's talking about the fact that the judge gagged the media from reporting about jailing him.
There was no valid reason to extend the D notice to cover Robinson's jailing.
oh jesus fucking wept......
oh jesus fucking wept......
yeah this boy beat tucker the lying fuckers to the pip.. preempted him if you will// this effectively counters Carlson on every point.
top cut as long story short....
while the trial of those paedo fucks is going on there is a reporting restriction on it.
There are reporters AT the court taking notes but they cannot report it until the trial and it's associated trials have been judged as they don't want the trial fucking up for the reasons stated above.
now i am busy working.. take time to digest that.. i have better things to do that argue over some silly English racist wanker who got too smart and overconfident for his boot and it bit him in his arse.
I has bills to pay :-)
pax wrote:
Pax you need to pay attention here. Please stop repeating yourself and stay on topic.
Then why are you repeating yourself with irrelevant nonsense? Save everyone's time and just answer the question I've asked you three times now: where is Carlson lying?
holy fuck
tell you what Nibs.. everythingt you need is in
A/ that video
B/ what i have said
C/ i cease to give any fucks as i am working atm, have made my point.. which is a simple one.......Carlson is mis-representing the truth and looking on it from a placed of court TV and publicized trials.. this is not a place like that and thus reporting restrictions till the trial is done is common. simple, plain, obvious.
Tommy was arrested and convicted for filming inside a court building... he was confronting the defendants and all sorts of nonsense while the trial was LIVE,he was sentenced to a suspended sentence..., he then starts filming using language that legally get him in trouble and it did... he pleaded guilty.. suspended sentence became 13 months.. and fuck him tbh.
that counters tucker the fucker Carlson take on it plain and simple...
the easiest way to shut Carlson up? just mention John Stewart.. i'm sure that wee cunt would shit himself.
now to finish my days work instead of going round in circles because it amuses you
pax wrote:
Excuse me? I don't find you repeating irrelevancies (as though that makes them any more relevant) amusing, so cut the shit. I don't give a fuck about Robinson, or Hopkins. I do give a fuck about freedom of speech. Do you? Muzzling reporting of Robinson getting 13 months is a serious problem. This is not a radical concept. You keep repeating Robinson's past as though it has any bearing whatsoever on the muzzling of reporting on his being jailed. It does not.
pax wrote:
BULLSHIT. At no point does that video explain where Carlson lied. It has a few seconds of him here, where he says:
OK so what about that is a lie? Is there more from that audio that I missed?
BULLSHIT. I've asked you repeatedly where Tucker lied, and all you've done is repeated Robinson's offenses.
and....
if you stopped this stance about "contempt of court" being a non issue fake news type thing then you'd realise that tucker Carlson's pish about this being a "freedom of speech is dead in the uk" issue then you see it's a "protection of the the fairness of the trial process" issue.
D-notices are issued a LOT during cases like this.. ALL THE TIME. To protect the fairness and keep everything as fair as possible for both the defense and prosecution"
So Tucker makes it an issue about free speech as that fatuous fuckpiece is looking at it from an American point of view where everything from, court to Kim Kardashian taking a shit is on TV.
This is an important case where a bunch of "alleged" kiddy fiddlers are up in front of a judge in a series of related cases.
Tom,my went vert close to fucking it up due to the attention drawn to the case which can potentially sway a jury and have either a retrial with a new jury selected or a mis-trial where nasty assholes will get off Scot free.
The video explains it very well(glad you watched it) in that it's not just INSIDE the court but also the "court precincts" and as he wasss pretty much on the steps of the courts.. it's a fair cop as it were.
so basically Carlson is either just plain ignorant of how UK justice works.. or.. more likely is willfully misrepresenting things and considering he got Katie fucking Hopkins who is as popular here as setting about your own face with a Hilti gun then pissing on your own face. And her utter shite about Tom,m,y being killed in prison is laughable.... one thing the state doesn't like is martyrs of people like Tommy, it just won't happen.
Even the guy Murray admits that D-notices(reporting restrictions) are normal during cases like this for obvious and painfully repeated reasons above :P
pax wrote:
How can I stop what I never started? Where did I say it was fake news? I said it was irrelevant to the question I asked. BTW Carlson at no point was under the illusion that Robinson did not break the law, or that he violated a condition of his previous sentencing.
Why do you think I'm stupid? Seriously, why do you believe that I haven't thoroughly researched the situation before speaking about it? Do yourself a favour and never assume I'm ignorant about any topic I speak about.
Spare me yet another shrill repetition of the obvious. You're not talking to a cretin, and I don't appreciate being treated like one.
D-Notices are not necessary when jury sequestration is used, which is done in Canada ALL THE TIME.
I'm not interested in your personal opinion of Carlson, especially since you've made it so clear so often that you're sounding like a broken record. So you hate Carlson. Why should we give a fuck about what you think of him? Why is it that you think your opinion of Carlson is so important to us that you have to repeat it constantly?
As I have already said, Carlson is concerned about the muzzling of the reporting of Robinson's immediate arrest and incarceration, not his past misdeeds. He's also concerned about the insanely harsh sentence. Why do you have a problem understanding such a simple concept, even after i have repeated this several times? Is it because you're deliberately twisting the truth to suit your biases, just like you accuse Carlson of?
Yes we know what the case is about, ffs.
Yes, we understand the concept, thanks. Please stop lecturing us like we're cretins. This supposed problem that your country's courts have decided to deal with in this totalitarian manner is dealt with quite easily in Canada and other civilised nations that don't have a long history of allowing the courts to be ruled by a criminal class. It's called jury sequestration. No suppression of information, no risk of tainting the jury. Easy fucking peasy. This is built into common law, but for some inexplicable reason you people prefer the hard way.
Nothing to watch; it was an audio file of a guy constantly repeating ad nauseum the same shit over and over again, like he was talking to an autistic child. It was also 100% irrelevant to my question, despite your claim otherwise. Thanks for wasting my time.
I'm not going to waste time asking you how he's misrepresenting things, because I don't enjoy being lectured like I'm a stupid fool, and your opinion is irrelevant anyway. I will however tell you that your country's penchant for gagging instead of sequestering is a serious problem, and very dangerous for democracy.
Your system has been twisted to favour the criminal and the incompetent to the detriment of truth and justice. As you well know the gangs of pedophiles were allowed to run amok for decades while their victims' voices were ignored, all because spineless authorities didn't want to be seen as racist. As you well know, the conduct of your authorities has horrified hundreds of millions of people. So maybe it shouldn't come as a surprise to you that they get even more horrified when they see people unnecessarily jailed for obscenely harsh sentences while the people who enabled the gangs of pedophiles to destroy young people's lives for their kicks get off Scot free.
~looks up~
wow...lol
keep drinking the Carlson Cool aid!