81:04
we'd say in science which meant that we
81:06
had
81:07
all half the deaths in america been in
81:09
nursing homes and places
81:10
because we didn't do the things to
81:12
protect the most vulnerable
81:14
while at the same time spending
81:16
trillions
81:17
controlling all the others so one of the
81:20
problems is that
81:22
if you were to do i call this murder by
81:24
bureaucrat
81:25
if you were to write a script for
81:28
ensuring the maximum number of deaths
81:30
and the least effective thing to do
81:33
it would be what we've been doing
81:34
frankly as a doctor i'm telling you this
79:25
things that has
79:26
concerned me from march until now or
79:29
february
79:30
and by the way the people at the the
79:32
army bio warfare and fort dietrich have
79:34
all told me they knew about this thing
79:35
in december
79:38
everyone knew about it so in march when
79:40
they shut down society
79:43
and what happened is that people are
79:46
doing things without
79:47
any scientific basis or knowledge but
79:50
they're just going yes
79:52
so everyone's unfortunately they're not
79:55
questioning authority which is i think
79:58
people must do
79:59
but they're also become sort of sheeple
80:02
that whatever everyone's doing i'm gonna
80:04
do it
80:05
and i think that's a way that the uh
80:07
this
80:08
sort of super state this covert uh
80:11
group is trying to see how far can we
80:14
control the populace
80:16
and will they go along with any
80:18
anti-scientific
80:19
thing that sounds scientific but it's
80:22
not
80:22
and is it it sounds rational but it
80:25
isn't
80:26
um while we don't do anything meaningful
80:29
to contain
80:30
the outbreak for example a lot of people
80:32
don't know this
80:34
if you are under age 70 the risk of
80:36
death from covet is
80:38
0.04 about the same as the flu
80:41
now the elderly population with
80:42
comorbidities very high risk
80:45
and this virus spreads at two or three
80:47
times the rate of the flu
80:48
but instead of putting a hermetically
80:51
sealed
80:52
protection and support around the high
80:54
risk population
80:57
we tried to lock down all of society
81:00
but left the high-risk population
81:02
semi-permeable
81:36
on the other hand what's being left out
81:39
with the myopia of academics and
81:41
government
81:42
bureaucrats is that the number of deaths
81:46
related
81:46
to the lockdown cancer deaths opioid
81:50
overdoses
81:51
suicides people not getting cancer
81:55
screening people not coming in for heart
81:57
attacks strokes
81:58
is about five to ten times the number
82:02
of covetous this is a fact the u.n
82:05
even is admitting that globally at least
82:07
100 million people are going to die
82:10
due to how we responded to the virus not
82:13
the virus
82:14
so this is one of these things that if
82:17
you're
82:18
actually a public health person
82:20
concerned about the public health
82:23
you wouldn't just look at one metric
82:26
covet deaths amongst the elderly you
82:28
would look at all of it
82:30
and make a rational series of risk
82:33
benefit decisions that would be rational
82:36
that didn't happen from december until
82:38
march or even until now
82:40
and you have to ask the question why i
82:43
i'm one of my concerns is that people
82:46
just going on almost a pavlovian
82:49
uh sort of knee-jerk response responses
82:51
going on automatically with what
82:53
authority figures are saying
82:56
are kind of a test to see when they
82:59
roll out this alien threat and i've
83:02
talked to carol rosin about this
83:04
is that that is there's this is sort of
83:07
a test to see
83:08
how far can we actually brainwash the
83:11
public to do things that are
83:13
anti-scientific
83:15
anti-rational ineffective but everyone
83:18
goes along with it